Home > Blogs > The Hlog by Mike Hlas > Badgers drop beer ads from broadcasts – will others soon follow suit?

The Hlog by Mike Hlas

Badgers drop beer ads from broadcasts – will others soon follow suit?

Posted on Aug 27, 2009 by Mike Hlas.

alcohol-free

Had the following news item occurred in, say Vermont or Oregon, we may not be paying any attention. But when it’s Wisconsin, it sends a statement.

The university has ended sponsorship agreements with MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch InBev for advertising during Badgers sports broadcasts. The deals had brought the university about $425,000 per year.

For more on this story, click here.

This is Wisconsin, where you can sense a different attitude about drinking the moment you cross from Marquette, Iowa over to Prairie du Chien, Wis. OK, that may be my imagination. But one of the most-enduring and best-known businesses in Prairie du Chien is Stark’s Sports Shop, where you can get a boat motor and a bottle of wine, or a rifle and a case of beer in one-stop shopping.

But I digress. Besides, every state has its serious problems involving alcohol use.

I’ve never forgotten the first night I was in Anchorage, Alaska, 14 years ago. I was in a place called the Polar Bar talking to the bartender. He said in winter, with little daylight, Alaskans drink heavily.

 I told him I believed Wisconsin had the highest alcohol consumption in the nation (whether true or not, who knows — probably not), and he got a little huffy, saying “We’re No. 1 per capita!”

This thing the U. of Wisconsin did, this was inevitable. What is also inevitable is that the many other major universities in the nation who have been taking the beer companies’ money, directly or indirectly, will stop doing it as well.

The University of Iowa – and I name it only because it’s the heartbeat of our sports coverage at the Gazette – has had Anheuser-Busch as a sponsor of its radio sportscasts for some time now. Surely, the “Budweiser Halftime Report” rings a bell to Hawkeye fans.

Learfield Sports manages Iowa, Iowa State and Northern Iowa sports radio broadcasts, as well as those of dozens of other schools. The business relationship between Learfield and Anheuser-Busch dates to the 1970s.

According to a 2004 SportsBusiness Journal survey, 70 percent of the NCAA’s Division I-A programs had deals with beer companies, either directly or through their rights holders. That probably hasn’t changed a great deal since then.

So this Wisconsin thing is a big deal. The school’s athletic program will have to figure out how to compensate for that $425,000, no small task these days.

But like I said … inevitable.

 

 

 

 

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Print this article or

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

5 Responses to “Badgers drop beer ads from broadcasts – will others soon follow suit?”

  1. CR2ICnBack

    27. Aug, 2009

    Seems silly to drop the ads and lost the $425,000/year. Truth is, you can stop the ads but you won't stop the purchase of the beer. It's like toothpaste… even if you don't advertise the product people still brush their teeth. Notice that they stopped airing cigarette ads years ago but people still smoke – several that have never seen an ad aired on TV!! I say… let the ads air, collect the money and put it to good use.

    Reply to this comment
  2. tandog

    27. Aug, 2009

    This is truly hard to believe.
    Wisconsin, where beer is #1 & always has been.
    Wisconsin, the place where there is a bar every 3rd house.
    Wisconsin, the home of more than it's share of great microbrewerys..
    Looks like the neoprohibitionists are winning again…

    Reply to this comment
  3. A_Cogitator

    28. Aug, 2009

    Another example of" Politically Correct " BS!

    Reply to this comment
  4. comncentzisback

    28. Aug, 2009

    typical 'head-in-the-sand' mentality. "Maybe if we don't advertise the beer or talk about the beer, the students will drink less of it". i agree with earlier posts. no way to keep them from drinking it, but now, the lose a half mil in revenue. you KNOW they are going to want to make that up…and you know who they will turn to…yep. the students via tuition increases and other fees. now not only can't the students drink (legally) they get to pay for it too! bravo UW!

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply