Hawkeye Football, Iowa Hawkeyes, Sports
Iowa offensive coordinator has had a satisifying year
Posted on Dec 25, 2009 by Marc Morehouse.
Ken O'Keefe, Iowa offensive coordinator
His quarterback threw 14 interceptions, his running backs led the Big Ten in cortisone shots and, eventually, his offense saw 20 different starters.
Had to have been a fun and interesting year for Ken O’Keefe, Iowa’s offensive coordinator.
“It would depend on what your definition of fun is,” O’Keefe said during a news conference last week.
Maybe satisfying would’ve been the better word for the question.
Iowa’s offense never has been a complete picture. It started in June, when No. 1 running back Jewel Hampton suffered a torn ACL. Then, all-star left tackle Bryan Bulaga missed three games with a thyroid condition. The Oct. 24 victory at Michigan State cost Hawkeyes offensive starters nine missed games, from guard Dace Richardson’s season-ending broken leg to running back Adam Robinson’s high-ankle sprain to wide receiver Colin Sandeman’s concussion.
And then, after an aggressive first quarter against Northwestern that had Iowa headed to 10-0, quarterback Ricky Stanzi suffered a nasty high-ankle sprain and was lost for the last two games of the regular season, including the de facto Big Ten championship game the next week at Ohio State.
With pretty much everything in flux throughout the year, Iowa’s offense, for the most part, found a way and the Hawkeyes are 10-2 and opposite Georgia Tech in the Orange Bowl on Jan. 5.
So, maybe not “fun and interesting,” but how about “satisfying”?
“This group of guys has been a lot of fun to coach and a lot of fun to be around. They’re a great group and being successful is important to them,” O’Keefe said. “Our guys are resilient. They believe in themselves and they believe in the ‘next man in’ theory. They approach that with great seriousness and the guy who steps in is expected to fill the spot and fill it well and not let the team down and that’s what we’ve seen for the most part.
“That makes it fun to be around these guys.”
For more “fun and interesting,” O’Keefe only needs to analyze the performance of Stanzi, whose season was a wild ride with more twists than Yoga.
Stanzi finished the season 154 of 275 (56 percent) for 2,189 yards, 15 TDs and 14 interceptions. At the beginning of the season, Stanzi struggled in the first half and came through in the second. Later, he just had nutty, nutty games, including the game-winning drive at Michigan State after not doing much and then the five-interception, two-TD, fourth-quarter comeback against Indiana.
It should be noted here in neon lights that Stanzi’s record as Iowa’s starter is 17-4.
O’Keefe hasn’t done a total analysis of Stanzi’s season, but he saw some good and some “sort of.” He was asked if Stanzi improved this season.
“I will say this; from a leadership standpoint, absolutely,” O’Keefe said about Stanzi’s progress. “From a performance standpoint, sort of.
“As many big plays as we made that were the difference in a game, we took the bare minimum, but we made them … It was disappointing that we didn’t take care of the ball as well as we should have. Rick would be the first to tell you that. We’re back working at that right now.”
O’Keefe acknowledged that he puts a lot on Stanzi. His directions to the junior are “be careful, but not too careful.”
“Being a quarterback is a tough job,” O’Keefe said. “He has me telling him to take care of the ball, and the next time I’m telling him to get the ball out of his hands. Those two things kind of don’t go together the right way.”
The other hot spot on Iowa’s offense — OK, the other massive hot spot — was running back.
The depth chart was basically turned upside down, with Hampton (knee) and freshman Jeff Brinson (foot) never factoring because of injury.
“We thought it might be Jewel, Brinson, Paki (O’Meara), Robinson and (true freshman Brandon) Wegher,” O’Keefe said. “The order got flipped a little bit. How would we know anything? Wegher wasn’t here, Robinson got limited reps in the spring. Until you put the ball in their hands against someone else, it’s hard to tell.”
Robinson and Wegher were relative unknowns when camp started last August and certainly when the season started. They ended up being the team’s top two rushers with Robinson gaining 775 yards with five TDs and Wegher going for 528 yards and seven TDs.
“I will say this, I think (running backs coach) Lester Erb has done an unreal job the last two years,” O’Keefe said. “He took Shonn Greene off the furniture truck and got him ready to play last year and Hampton was a true freshman last year.
“You look at this year, two guys that were relative unknowns at this level, with no experience, he’s done an outstanding job, especially in the pass game.
“Lester has done an unbelievable job of keeping those guys moving. He doesn’t even blink. Lester doesn’t blink about any of that stuff. He’s a great teacher.”
Post #1 I know it is late to post on this now, but I have got to comment on my take of the coaching job leading up to the present situation. The superb job of coaching for most of this season notwithstanding, I really can't understand KOK's decision to run the naked bootleg in the end zone against the NW Wildcats, especially with Wooten lined up on that side. Why do you take the chance in your own end zone of leaving the QB in such a vulnerable position? If there was ever a time for conservative play calling wouldn't this be it? The worst case scenerio should be obvious to a good coach, and that is exactly what came down. And we lost the QB for the rest of the season. Can anyone explain to me the wisdom of that decision? I know the play has been a good one for us in other situations this season, but at that point and with such a great player lined up on that side? I have a real hard time with that one, coach. It cost us the game. What gives?
Post #2 But now for the big craw-sticker. Why on earth do we sit on the ball at the end of regulation instead of trying to win at OSU? Why does logic tell coach Ferentz that we shouldn't at least try to move the 30 yards needed for a field goal attempt to win the game outright. So instead we give the Buckeyes another chance to win the game rather than take the game from them? Are you kidding? After a season of the kind you have had up to that point? After the guts your players have spilled out onto the field all year long? After they have put themsleves into the position to WIN the game in regulation?
Post #3 And what are the consequences of trying to win in regulation? If you miss the field goal you have sudden death. Let your defense stop them again to force it if need be. If you fail to pick up the needed first downs for an attempt you then sit on the ball for sudden death. If you happen to make the field goal you WIN THE GAME. If you throw an interception and lose the game, well at least you went down fighting. But the bottom line is you try to let your players try to win the game in regulation. They deserved the chance to do that. What kind of message do you send to your team when you sit on the ball?
I don't like to be cut off with my comments like this. Let me say what I want to say. The new system curtails your reader's opinions a bit too much.
Post #1 What a great season for the Hawks. I was unable to follow the last two games because of travel plans made months ago, and was certainly disappointed to read about coming so close to winning the Big 10 only to have the spoiled Buckeyes once again enjoy the Rose Bowl. I know it is late to post on this now, but I have got to comment on my take of the coaching job leading up to the present situation. The superb job of coaching for most of this season notwithstanding, I really can't understand KOK's decision to run the naked bootleg in the end zone against the NW Wildcats, especially with Wooten lined up on that side.
Post #1B Why do you take the chance in your own end zone of leaving the QB in such a vulnerable position? If there was ever a time for conservative play calling wouldn't this be it? The worst case scenerio should be obvious to a good coach, and that is exactly what came down. And we lost the QB for the rest of the season. Can anyone explain to me the wisdom of that decision? I know the play has been a good one for us in other situations this season, but at that point and with such a great player lined up on that side? I have a real hard time with that one, coach. It cost us the game. What gives?
Why do you take the chance in your own end zone of leaving the QB in such a vulnerable position? If there was ever a time for conservative play calling wouldn't this be it? The worst case scenerio should be obvious to a good coach, and that is exactly what came down. And we lost the QB for the rest of the season. Can anyone explain to me the wisdom of that decision? I know the play has been a good one for us in other situations this season, but I have a real hard time with that one. It cost us the game.
I give up. I am too wordy for the new system, and it has hacked the comments into disjointed bits. It was a good commentary in my opinion, and not too long for your readers. You make it impossible to state one's feelings beyond six sentences.
Post #? Why do you take the chance in your own end zone of leaving the QB in such a vulnerable position? If there was ever a time for conservative play calling wouldn't this be it? The worst case scenerio should be obvious to a good coach, and that is exactly what came down. And we lost the QB for the rest of the season. Can anyone explain to me the wisdom of that decision? I know the play has been a good one for us in other situations this season, but at that point and with such a great player lined up on that side? I have a real hard time with that one, coach. It cost us the game. What gives?
Post #4 What kind of message do you send to your team when you sit on the ball? That you don't have enough confidence in them to pull it off? Come on, Coach, they had the OSU defense on the ropes. Your QB was ON FIRE! He was ready to win the game for you. Your receivers were going to get open for you no matter what. They were not going to be denied! You had taken the crowd out of the game. You had plenty of time plus one time out to get into position to win. And your kicker would have made the kick. Had he been given the chance. What possible reason did you have for not going for the win? I respect the coaching staff, and I am impressed for all they have done, but that decision was really a terrible one, for the fans and especially for the players. Take a few more chances please Capt. Kirk.